[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1203615560.3750.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:39:20 -0800
From: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] ext4: Use page_mkwrite vma_operations to get mmap
write notification.
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 09:13 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> We would like to get notified when we are doing a write on mmap section.
> This is needed with respect to preallocated area. We split the preallocated
> area into initialzed extent and uninitialzed extent in the call back. This
> let us handle ENOSPC better. Otherwise we get ENOSPC in the writepage and
> that would result in data loss. The changes are also needed to handle ENOSPC
> when writing to an mmap section of files with holes.
>
Hi Aneesh,
I have a concern, it seems we missed journalling the allocation activity
for the mmaped write. See comments below...
Another thing, perhaps similar patch should be ported to ext2/3, as this
also addressed the mmaped write ENOSPC error without
preallocation/deleyed allocation.
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/file.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/ext4_fs.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
> index 20507a2..77341c1 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,23 @@ force_commit:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static struct vm_operations_struct ext4_file_vm_ops = {
> + .fault = filemap_fault,
> + .page_mkwrite = ext4_page_mkwrite,
> +};
> +
> +static int ext4_file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> + struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
> +
> + if (!mapping->a_ops->readpage)
> + return -ENOEXEC;
> + file_accessed(file);
> + vma->vm_ops = &ext4_file_vm_ops;
> + vma->vm_flags |= VM_CAN_NONLINEAR;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> const struct file_operations ext4_file_operations = {
> .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
> .read = do_sync_read,
> @@ -133,7 +150,7 @@ const struct file_operations ext4_file_operations = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> .compat_ioctl = ext4_compat_ioctl,
> #endif
> - .mmap = generic_file_mmap,
> + .mmap = ext4_file_mmap,
> .open = generic_file_open,
> .release = ext4_release_file,
> .fsync = ext4_sync_file,
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 34f3eb6..81faa67 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3466,3 +3466,9 @@ int ext4_change_inode_journal_flag(struct inode *inode, int val)
>
> return err;
> }
> +
> +int ext4_page_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page)
> +{
> + return block_page_mkwrite(vma, page, ext4_get_block);
> +}
> +
I don't see block allocation being journalled here. block_page_mkwrite()
eventually calling block_prepare_write() which invokes ext4_get_block()
without starting a new journal handle.
Perhaps call ext4 write_begin() and write_end() inode operations, that
would taking care of different write_begin and write_end for three
different journalling mode.
Mingming
> diff --git a/include/linux/ext4_fs.h b/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
> index 22810b1..8f5a563 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
> @@ -1059,6 +1059,7 @@ extern void ext4_set_aops(struct inode *inode);
> extern int ext4_writepage_trans_blocks(struct inode *);
> extern int ext4_block_truncate_page(handle_t *handle, struct page *page,
> struct address_space *mapping, loff_t from);
> +extern int ext4_page_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page);
>
> /* ioctl.c */
> extern long ext4_ioctl(struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists