linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] e2fsprogs: error checking in blkid/devname.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47BEE420.8030105@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:02:56 -0600
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
CC:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	pspencer@...lds.utoronto.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsprogs: error checking in blkid/devname.c

Theodore Tso wrote:
> This looks good, but I assume that the bug was caused by some race
> condition where if you try to call dm_task_get_info() while some other
> process is creating or removing a snapshot, dm_task_get_info() is
> returning some kind of EAGAIN, or some other "Try again; we're busy"
> error, right?
> 
> If that is the case, can you try to find out what error is being
> returned?  It may be the right thing to do is to check to see if we
> are getting a "resource is locked; try again in a sec" error message,
> and retry the dm_task_get_info(), instead of just returning a failure.

well, dm_task_get_info just returns either 0 or 1; unless there is some
other contextual piece of information to use, I don't know if we can
differentiate between error types.  I'll ask agk...

> Thanks!!
> 
> 						- Ted

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html