[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47BEFDD4.1040803@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:52:36 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
CC: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
pspencer@...lds.utoronto.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsprogs: error checking in blkid/devname.c
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:16:53AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> From a quick chat with agk, it sounds like outright failure is
>> appropriate. Sounds like most of the calls fail for reasons like ENOMEM
>> (but it might be nice if it returned that, eh?)
>
> So the question then is why is it that Phillip was able to seeing
> failures when he was creating and deleting snapshots?
>
> I don't mind having blkid return a failure, but it may not fix
> Phillip's scenario which he listed in BZ #433857; yeah, he won't have
> a core dump, which is good, but it might mean that some or all of the
> dm volumes disappear from the blkid results.
Maybe a device-mapper bug is in order :)
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists