[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080222182310.GC6629@skywalker>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:53:10 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Use page_mkwrite vma_operations to get mmap
write notification.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:10:48AM -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 20:09 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
.....
> > + ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> > + if (!ret && ext4_should_order_data(inode)) {
> > + ret = walk_page_buffers(handle, page_buffers(page),
> > + 0, end, NULL, ext4_journal_dirty_data);
> > + }
> > + if (!ret)
> > + ret = block_commit_write(page, 0, end);
> > +
> Hmm, it seems wired to do commit_write when the page is about becoming
> writable, but maybe that's the way it needs to?
>
> Don't we need to update the i_size somewhere?
block_commit_write simply iterate over buffer_head of page and mark them
dirty. That is why we don't want to call that for data=journalled mode.
>
> > + ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> > +out_unlock:
> > + unlock_page(page);
> > + mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> It seems this combined the three journalling mode prepare_write() code
> here:(
>
> Since prepare_write() and commit_write() is going to sunset, why not
> simply calling mappings->a_ops->write_begin() and then write_end()? that
> should take care of pretty much the journalling and the page operations,
> no?
write_begin and write_end works with the user space buffer. In this case
we don't have one. Also what ext4_page_mkwrite does is mostly what
write_begin/write_end does except the copy of user space buffer.
-aneesh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists