lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:34:19 -0700
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, jbacik@...hat.com,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] add a jbd option to force an unclean journal	state

On Mar 04, 2008  15:58 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> - mount the filesystem with `-o ro_after=100'
> 
> - the fs arms a timer to go off in 100 seconds
> 
> - now you start running some filesystem stress test
> 
> - the timer goes off.  At timer-interrupt time, flags are set which cause
>   the low-level driver layer to start silently ignoring all writes to the
>   device which backs the filesystem.
> 
>   This simulates a crash or poweroff.
> 
> - Now up in userspace we
> 
>   - kill off the stresstest
>   - unmount the fs
>   - mount the fs (to run recovery)
>   - unmount the fs
>   - fsck it
>   - mount the fs
>     - check the data content of the files which the stresstest was writing:
>       look for uninitialised blocks, incorrect data, etc.
>   - unmount the fs
> 
> - start it all again.
> 
> 
> So it's 100% scriptable and can be left running overnight, etc.  It found
> quite a few problems with ext3/jbd recovery which I doubt could be found by
> other means.  This was 6-7 years ago and I'd expect that new recovery bugs
> have crept in since then which it can expose.
> 
> I think we should implement this in a formal, mergeable fashion, as there
> are numerous filesystems which could and should use this sort of testing
> infrastructure.

We use a patch which is a distant ancestor of Andrew's original patch to
do very similar testing for Lustre + ext3, allowing us to simulate node
crashes.  This patch is against 2.6.22, but the relevant code doesn't
appear significantly changed in newer kernels.  YMMV.

The major difference between this code and Andrew's original code is
that this allows multiple devices to be turned read-only at one time
(e.g. ext3 filesystem + external journal), while the original code wasn't
very robust in that area.

There is no mechanism to enable this from userspace or the filesystem,
since there is Lustre code in the kernel that calls dev_set_rdonly()
on one or more devices when we hit a failure trigger, but adding the
timer code or a /proc or /sys entry for this would be easy.

The device is reset only when the last reference to it is removed in
kill_bdev() so that there isn't a race with re-enabling writes to the
device while there are still dirty buffers outstanding, and certainly
corrupting the filesystem.  That's why dev_clear_rdonly() is not exported.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>

Index: linux-2.6.22.5/block/ll_rw_blk.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.5.orig/block/ll_rw_blk.c	2007-08-22 17:23:54.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.22.5/block/ll_rw_blk.c	2008-02-21 01:07:16.000000000 -0700
@@ -3101,6 +3101,8 @@
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST */
 
+int dev_check_rdonly(struct block_device *bdev);
+
 /**
  * generic_make_request: hand a buffer to its device driver for I/O
  * @bio:  The bio describing the location in memory and on the device.
@@ -3185,6 +3187,12 @@ static inline void __generic_make_request
 
 		if (unlikely(test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, &q->queue_flags)))
 			goto end_io;
+
+		if (unlikely(bio->bi_rw == WRITE &&
+		             dev_check_rdonly(bio->bi_bdev))) {
+			bio_endio(bio, bio->bi_size, 0);
+			break;
+		}
 
 		if (should_fail_request(bio))
 			goto end_io;
@@ -3850,6 +3858,100 @@ void swap_io_context(struct io_context
 	*ioc2 = temp;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(swap_io_context);
+
+ /*
+ * Debug code for turning block devices "read-only" (will discard writes
+ * silently).  This is for filesystem crash/recovery testing.
+ */
+struct deventry {
+	dev_t dev;
+	struct deventry *next;
+};
+
+static struct deventry *devlist = NULL;
+static spinlock_t devlock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; 
+
+int dev_check_rdonly(struct block_device *bdev) 
+{
+	struct deventry *cur;
+
+	if (!bdev)
+		return 0;
+
+	spin_lock(&devlock);
+	cur = devlist;
+	while (cur) {
+		if (bdev->bd_dev == cur->dev) {
+			spin_unlock(&devlock);
+			return 1;
+		}
+		cur = cur->next;
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&devlock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void dev_set_rdonly(struct block_device *bdev)
+{
+	struct deventry *newdev, *cur;
+
+	if (!bdev) 
+		return;
+
+	newdev = kmalloc(sizeof(struct deventry), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!newdev) 
+		return;
+	
+	spin_lock(&devlock);
+	cur = devlist;
+	while (cur) {
+		if (bdev->bd_dev == cur->dev) {
+			spin_unlock(&devlock);
+			kfree(newdev);
+			return;
+		}
+		cur = cur->next;
+	}
+	newdev->dev = bdev->bd_dev;
+	newdev->next = devlist;
+	devlist = newdev;
+	spin_unlock(&devlock);
+
+	printk(KERN_WARNING "Turning device %s (%#x) read-only\n",
+	       bdev->bd_disk ? bdev->bd_disk->disk_name : "", bdev->bd_dev);
+}
+
+void dev_clear_rdonly(struct block_device *bdev) 
+{
+	struct deventry *cur, *last = NULL;
+
+	if (!bdev)
+		return;
+
+	spin_lock(&devlock);
+	cur = devlist;
+	while (cur) {
+		if (bdev->bd_dev == cur->dev) {
+			if (last) 
+				last->next = cur->next;
+			else
+				devlist = cur->next;
+			spin_unlock(&devlock);
+			kfree(cur);
+			printk(KERN_WARNING "Removing read-only on %s (%#x)\n",
+			       bdev->bd_disk ? bdev->bd_disk->disk_name :
+					       "unknown block", bdev->bd_dev);
+			return;
+		}
+		last = cur;
+		cur = cur->next;
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&devlock);
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_set_rdonly);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_check_rdonly);
 
 /*
  * sysfs parts below
Index: linux-2.6.22.5/fs/block_dev.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.5.orig/fs/block_dev.c	2007-08-22 17:23:54.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.22.5/fs/block_dev.c	2008-02-21 01:07:16.000000000 -0700
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static void kill_bdev(struct block_device *bdev)
 		return;
 	invalidate_bh_lrus();
 	truncate_inode_pages(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, 0);
+	dev_clear_rdonly(bdev);
 }	
 
 int set_blocksize(struct block_device *bdev, int size)
Index: linux-2.6.22.5/include/linux/fs.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.5.orig/include/linux/fs.h	2008-02-21 00:58:18.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.22.5/include/linux/fs.h	2008-02-21 01:07:16.000000000 -0700
@@ -1744,6 +1744,10 @@
 extern void submit_bio(int, struct bio *);
 extern int bdev_read_only(struct block_device *);
 #endif
+#define HAVE_CLEAR_RDONLY_ON_PUT
+extern void dev_set_rdonly(struct block_device *bdev);
+extern int dev_check_rdonly(struct block_device *bdev);
+extern void dev_clear_rdonly(struct block_device *bdev);
 extern int set_blocksize(struct block_device *, int);
 extern int sb_set_blocksize(struct super_block *, int);
 extern int sb_min_blocksize(struct super_block *, int);

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ