| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200803070857.m278vH2S014106@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:57:17 -0800
From: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: duaneg@...da.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: + jbd2-eliminate-duplicated-code-in-revocation-table-init-destroy-functions.patch added to -mm tree
The patch titled
jbd2: eliminate duplicated code in revocation table init/destroy functions
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
jbd2-eliminate-duplicated-code-in-revocation-table-init-destroy-functions.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: jbd2: eliminate duplicated code in revocation table init/destroy functions
From: "Duane Griffin" <duaneg@...da.com>
The revocation table initialisation/destruction code is repeated for each of
the two revocation tables stored in the journal. Refactoring the duplicated
code into functions is tidier, simplifies the logic in initialisation in
particular, and slightly reduces the code size.
There should not be any functional change.
Signed-off-by: Duane Griffin <duaneg@...da.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
fs/jbd2/revoke.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/jbd2/revoke.c~jbd2-eliminate-duplicated-code-in-revocation-table-init-destroy-functions fs/jbd2/revoke.c
--- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c~jbd2-eliminate-duplicated-code-in-revocation-table-init-destroy-functions
+++ a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
@@ -196,108 +196,89 @@ void jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke_caches(
jbd2_revoke_table_cache = NULL;
}
-/* Initialise the revoke table for a given journal to a given size. */
-
-int jbd2_journal_init_revoke(journal_t *journal, int hash_size)
+static int jbd2_journal_init_revoke_table(struct jbd2_revoke_table_s *table,
+ int size)
{
- int shift, tmp;
+ int shift = 0;
+ int tmp = size;
- J_ASSERT (journal->j_revoke_table[0] == NULL);
-
- shift = 0;
- tmp = hash_size;
while((tmp >>= 1UL) != 0UL)
shift++;
- journal->j_revoke_table[0] = kmem_cache_alloc(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!journal->j_revoke_table[0])
- return -ENOMEM;
- journal->j_revoke = journal->j_revoke_table[0];
-
- /* Check that the hash_size is a power of two */
- J_ASSERT(is_power_of_2(hash_size));
-
- journal->j_revoke->hash_size = hash_size;
-
- journal->j_revoke->hash_shift = shift;
-
- journal->j_revoke->hash_table =
- kmalloc(hash_size * sizeof(struct list_head), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!journal->j_revoke->hash_table) {
- kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, journal->j_revoke_table[0]);
- journal->j_revoke = NULL;
+ table->hash_size = size;
+ table->hash_shift = shift;
+ table->hash_table = kmalloc(
+ size * sizeof(struct list_head), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!table->hash_table)
return -ENOMEM;
- }
- for (tmp = 0; tmp < hash_size; tmp++)
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&journal->j_revoke->hash_table[tmp]);
+ for (tmp = 0; tmp < size; tmp++)
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&table->hash_table[tmp]);
- journal->j_revoke_table[1] = kmem_cache_alloc(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!journal->j_revoke_table[1]) {
- kfree(journal->j_revoke_table[0]->hash_table);
- kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, journal->j_revoke_table[0]);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
-
- journal->j_revoke = journal->j_revoke_table[1];
+ return 0;
+}
- /* Check that the hash_size is a power of two */
+/* Initialise the revoke table for a given journal to a given size. */
+int jbd2_journal_init_revoke(journal_t *journal, int hash_size)
+{
+ J_ASSERT(journal->j_revoke_table[0] == NULL);
J_ASSERT(is_power_of_2(hash_size));
- journal->j_revoke->hash_size = hash_size;
-
- journal->j_revoke->hash_shift = shift;
-
- journal->j_revoke->hash_table =
- kmalloc(hash_size * sizeof(struct list_head), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!journal->j_revoke->hash_table) {
- kfree(journal->j_revoke_table[0]->hash_table);
- kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, journal->j_revoke_table[0]);
- kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, journal->j_revoke_table[1]);
- journal->j_revoke = NULL;
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
+ journal->j_revoke_table[0] = kmem_cache_alloc(
+ jbd2_revoke_table_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!journal->j_revoke_table[0])
+ goto failed_alloc1;
+ if (jbd2_journal_init_revoke_table(journal->j_revoke_table[0], hash_size))
+ goto failed_init1;
+
+ journal->j_revoke_table[1] = kmem_cache_alloc(
+ jbd2_revoke_table_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!journal->j_revoke_table[1])
+ goto failed_alloc2;
+ if (jbd2_journal_init_revoke_table(journal->j_revoke_table[1], hash_size))
+ goto failed_init2;
- for (tmp = 0; tmp < hash_size; tmp++)
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&journal->j_revoke->hash_table[tmp]);
+ journal->j_revoke = journal->j_revoke_table[1];
spin_lock_init(&journal->j_revoke_lock);
return 0;
-}
-/* Destoy a journal's revoke table. The table must already be empty! */
+failed_init2:
+ kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, journal->j_revoke_table[1]);
+failed_alloc2:
+ kfree(journal->j_revoke_table[0]->hash_table);
+failed_init1:
+ kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, journal->j_revoke_table[0]);
+failed_alloc1:
+ return -ENOMEM;
+}
-void jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke(journal_t *journal)
+static void jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke_table(struct jbd2_revoke_table_s *table)
{
- struct jbd2_revoke_table_s *table;
- struct list_head *hash_list;
int i;
+ struct list_head *hash_list;
- table = journal->j_revoke_table[0];
- if (!table)
- return;
-
- for (i=0; i<table->hash_size; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < table->hash_size; i++) {
hash_list = &table->hash_table[i];
- J_ASSERT (list_empty(hash_list));
+ J_ASSERT(list_empty(hash_list));
}
kfree(table->hash_table);
kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, table);
- journal->j_revoke = NULL;
+}
- table = journal->j_revoke_table[1];
- if (!table)
+/* Destroy a journal's revoke table. The table must already be empty! */
+void jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke(journal_t *journal)
+{
+ if (!journal->j_revoke_table[0])
return;
+ jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke_table(journal->j_revoke_table[0]);
+ journal->j_revoke = NULL;
- for (i=0; i<table->hash_size; i++) {
- hash_list = &table->hash_table[i];
- J_ASSERT (list_empty(hash_list));
- }
-
- kfree(table->hash_table);
- kmem_cache_free(jbd2_revoke_table_cache, table);
+ if (!journal->j_revoke_table[1])
+ return;
+ jbd2_journal_destroy_revoke_table(journal->j_revoke_table[1]);
journal->j_revoke = NULL;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from duaneg@...da.com are
jbd-eliminate-duplicated-code-in-revocation-table-init-destroy-functions.patch
jbd-replace-potentially-false-assertion-with-if-block.patch
jbd-only-create-debugfs-entries-if-cache-initialisation-is-successful.patch
jbd2-eliminate-duplicated-code-in-revocation-table-init-destroy-functions.patch
jbd2-replace-potentially-false-assertion-with-if-block.patch
jbd2-only-create-debugfs-and-stats-entries-if-cache-initialisation-is-successful.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists