[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9e943910803080840u251ade36j92612f6150de6cf9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 16:40:46 +0000
From: "Duane Griffin" <duaneg@...da.com>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "Andreas Dilger" <adilger@....com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>,
sct@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] jbd2: replace potentially false assertion with if block
On 08/03/2008, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 02:23:36PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
> > It would probably be prudent to verify that these caches are initialized
> > at journal_load() time and either re-try to create the cache, and/or report
> > an error in that case and refuse to continue mounting.
>
> That doesn't make any sense. They're initialized in module_init and
> destoryed in module_exit. They can never be zero at journal_load time
> unless you get random memory corruption overwriting exactly that pointer
> with zero.
If jbd is a module, sure, but not if it is statically linked in. I
have the stacktraces to prove it :)
Cheers,
Duane.
--
"I never could learn to drink that blood and call it wine" - Bob Dylan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists