[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47D93463.9040506@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:04:19 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
CC: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
cmm@...ibm.com, tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix fallocate to update the file size in each transaction.
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2008 11:25 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> + -x: run test after preallocating the area (1|2) 2 to not update size.\n\
>
> The issue with preallocating just a single area in fsx is that this isn't
> much different than starting the test with a single large write or truncate.
except that the filesystem does still have to manage the unwritten
extent splits properly... but I agree that ongoing extending and
non-extending fallocates of various sizes would be very interesting.
-Eric
> What would be a lot more useful is to have fsx continually do fallocate
> requests of variable sizes during the test. This would be quite similar
> to a "write" operation, except that it wouldn't change any existing data
> and holes would still read back as zero. The only difference is in the
> "do not update size" test any fallocate at the end of the file would not
> increase the file size.
>
> This would exercise the fallocate code a LOT because it would put unwritten
> extents in the middle of the file, map a single fallocate to multiple
> discontiguous holes of the file (not overwriting existing allocated data
> in the middle of the file), verify fallocate of an overlapping unwritten
> extent works, etc.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists