[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080314144021.GE7412@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:40:21 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: Matthias Koenig <mkoenig@...e.de>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsprogs- fix ext2fs_swap_inode_full attr test on BE
boxes
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 09:13:03AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Yep, there were 2 problems.
>
> One was that inode_scan_and_fix() wasn't moving all of large inodes.
>
> The other was that ext2fs_swap_inode_full was doing bad things for
> in-inode attrs on big endian boxes, that was the patch in this thread
> which isn't in the repo yet, but is in fact needed.
>
> I suppose that the iterative nature of my fix for this problem didn't
> help Ted keep things straight, sorry.
I actually *prefer* multiple patches, actually, but what works best
when there is a series of patches is to resend the whole patch stack
using git-format-patch or git-send-email --- or set up your own git
repository on the network (or use repo.or.cz) and send me a pull
request. But that requires much more use of git. :-)
In any case, I'll pull in the last change, and this time I promise
I'll be careful about remembering to use --author. That *is*
something I should be doing, but I certainly appreciate people using
git's facilities to make my life easier, thanks.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists