[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <47DE0F8D.2060106@rs.jp.nec.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:28:29 +0900
From: Akira Fujita <a-fujita@...jp.nec.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
CC: cmm@...ibm.com, tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ext4 online defrag header file changes
Hi Andreas,
>> How about renaming this structure from ext4_extent_data to
>> ext4_extent_info which used the extent in-core structure
>> and put it into ext4_fs_extents.h?
>> Because in-core super_block is ext4_sb_info.
>>
>> /*
>> * This is the extent in-core structure.
>> */
>> struct ext4_extent_info {
>> ext4_lblk_t ee_block; /* first logical block extent covers */
>> int ee_len; /* number of blocks covered by extent */
>> ext4_fsblk_t ee_start; /* first physical block extent covers */
>> };
>>
>
> Would it be possible to use the FIEMAP interface to get the file mapping
> data to userspace? That would avoid the need to have a second ioctl
> with nearly the same data.
>
Reducing ioctl makes sense.
But EXT4_EXTENTS_INFO needs to get the file mapping data
with inode number not file name.
So we should keep ext4_extents_info structure
or put ino entry in fiemap structure.
Regards, Akira
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists