linux-ext4 - Re: [2.6.25-rc5-ext4-36c86] attempt to access beyond end of device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <20080319113500.GI2971@webber.adilger.int>
Date:	Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:35:00 +0800
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@....COM>
To:	Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.25-rc5-ext4-36c86] attempt to access beyond end of device

On Mar 18, 2008  10:49 +0100, Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net wrote:
> During stress testing (workload: racer from ltp + fio/iometer), here
> is an error I am encountering:
> 8<------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> kernel: WARNING: at fs/buffer.c:1680 __block_write_full_page+0xd4/0x2af()
> kernel: Modules linked in:
> kernel: Pid: 13113, comm: dd Not tainted 2.6.25-rc5-ext4-36c86 #2

You should print out the page->mapping->host->i_ino in this message
and then you can possibly examine the filesystem to see if it is
a corrupt block allocation, or possibly random garbage in the block.

> kernel:  [<ffffffff8025da55>] balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr+0x186/0x2f8
> kernel:  [<ffffffff80258119>] generic_file_buffered_write+0x1f5/0x622
> kernel:  [<ffffffff802f6091>] ext4_mark_iloc_dirty+0x459/0x4cc
> kernel:  [<ffffffff80317b48>] jbd2_journal_stop+0x24b/0x257
> kernel:  [<ffffffff80258889>] __generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x343/0x377
> kernel:  [<ffffffff80258921>] generic_file_aio_write+0x64/0xc4
> kernel:  [<ffffffff802f42c3>] ext4_file_write+0xa0/0x125
> kernel:  [<ffffffff8027e4e0>] do_sync_write+0xd1/0x118
> kernel:  [<ffffffff8023f2c5>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
> kernel:  [<ffffffff8027ec31>] vfs_write+0xad/0x136
> kernel:  [<ffffffff8027f166>] sys_write+0x45/0x6e
> kernel:  [<ffffffff8020b04b>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80
> kernel:
> kernel: ---[ end trace 05e1c77d40267d33 ]---
> kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device
> kernel: sdc: rw=1, want=355304755152, limit=16064512
> kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on sdc

Hmm, is this filesystem formatted with 64BIT?  We shouldn't be getting
64-bit block numbers otherwise.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html