[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20080325091545.GA10906@webber.adilger.int>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:15:45 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Respin of the uninit_group patches
On Mar 17, 2008 09:28 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I've reworked this patch series to clean them up a bit. In
> particular, an unused ext2fs_scan_inode flag (EXT2_SF_DO_CSUM) was
> removed, and I made ext2fs_group_desc_csum() static, and added
> ext2fs_group_desc_csum_set(). In addition, ext2fs_group_desc_set()
> and ext2fs_group_desc_verify() take an ext2_filsys argument instead of
> a superblock and a pointer to a group descriptor, in order to simplify
> the calling code.
>
> If this looks good, this should be the next set of patches to move
> into the 'next' branch.
I note in our bugzilla that we still have an open bug against the
uninit_groups patch related to resize2fs, related to the fact that
resize2fs allocating new inodes or blocks will likely not clear
the UNINIT flags from the groups it is working on:
https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12002
I verified that the code to disable resize2fs is still in the "next"
branch, so there is no immediate danger, but it also means that
filesystems with uninit_groups enabled can not be resized.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists