[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47ECFAC7.3050404@bull.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:03:51 +0100
From: Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@...l.net>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mballoc errors
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> This report just came in on the fedora list...
>
> EXT4-fs error (device dm-0): ext4_mb_generate_buddy: EXT4-fs: group 717:
> 23410 blocks in bitmap, 23411 in gd
>
> EXT4-fs error (device dm-0): ext4_mb_generate_buddy: EXT4-fs: group 721:
> 19309 blocks in bitmap, 19333 in gd
>
> has anyone else seen this problem in testing? I guess it means
> freespace accounting got out of sync...?
>
I've got no problem running tests on filesystems with a 4K blocksize.
But since I work on FS with 1K blocksize, I've got the following errors
while running fsstress:
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_ext_find_extent: bad header in inode #4407333:
invalid magic - magic dada, entries 56026, max 56026(0), depth 56026(0)
or
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid block bitmap -
block_group = 6767, block = 55435267
I already found a bug in the patch ext4-fallocate-full-fs-ENOSPC-handling.
In the function, ext4_ext_zeroout()
/* convert ee_pblock in 512 byte sector */
ee_pblock = ee_pblock << (blkbits >> 9);
should be
ee_pblock = ee_pblock << (blkbits - 9);
But after doing this change, the problems occur more quickly.
I'm not sure that the function ext4_ext_zeroout() is correct if
blocksize < pagesize.
Aneesh, could you check that please?
Thanks,
Valerie
How I reproduce the problem:
# mkfs.ext3 -I256 -E test_fs -b 1024 /dev/sdc1
# mount -t ext4dev /dev/sdc1 /mnt/test
# fsstress -d /mnt/test -n1000 -p1000
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists