linux-ext4 - Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm1 - BUG in fs/jbd/transaction.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1207246695.27710.292.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Date:	Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:18:15 -0400
From:	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	sct@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, eparis@...hat.com,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm1 - BUG in fs/jbd/transaction.c


On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 12:39 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:27:15 -0400
> Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:12:49PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> > > On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:32:14 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc8/2.6.25-rc8-mm1/
> > > 
> > > (Yes, I know the kernel is tainted.  Hopefully the traceback will make
> > > enough sense that it won't matter.  I think I cc'd most everybody who is
> > > listed in MAINTAINERS or had a non-trivial jbd, quota, or ext3 patch in the broken-out/)
> > > 
> > > So I was running a 'yum update' on my laptop, walked away to ask a cow-orker
> > > a question, and came back to find it had BUG'ed twice...  Amazingly
> > > enough, although it died in ext3 code, it apparently only nuked whatever
> > > filesystem it was handling, as syslog was still able to log the gory details
> > > into a file in /var. Given that a kernel rpm was the one it failed on, the
> > > I/O was almost certainly on either / or /boot - both ext3. / is mounted
> > > with quotas, /boot isn't, so I'm betting on /
> > > 
> > > Apr  2 13:48:07 turing-police yum: Updated: texlive-texmf-latex-2007-18.fc9.noarch
> > > Apr  2 13:48:08 turing-police yum: Updated: 1:openoffice.org-xsltfilter-2.4.0-12.4.fc9.x86_64
> > > Apr  2 13:48:09 turing-police yum: Updated: 1:openoffice.org-javafilter-2.4.0-12.4.fc9.x86_64
> > > Apr  2 13:48:12 turing-police yum: Updated: kernel-headers-2.6.25-0.185.rc7.git6.fc9.x86_64
> > > 
> > > (here, it started updating kernel-2.6.25-0.185.rc7.git6 and died while I wasn't looking)
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > Try this patch, it will keep us from re-entering the fs when we aren't supposed
> > to.  cc'ing Eric Paris since he's the only selinux guy I know :).  I don't think
> > any of the other allocations in here need to be fixed, but I didn't look too
> > carefully.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com>
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> > index c2fef7b..820d07a 100644
> > --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> > +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int inode_alloc_security(struct inode *inode)
> >  	struct task_security_struct *tsec = current->security;
> >  	struct inode_security_struct *isec;
> >  
> > -	isec = kmem_cache_zalloc(sel_inode_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	isec = kmem_cache_zalloc(sel_inode_cache, GFP_NOFS);
> >  	if (!isec)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> > @@ -2429,7 +2429,7 @@ static int selinux_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
> >  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >  
> >  	if (name) {
> > -		namep = kstrdup(XATTR_SELINUX_SUFFIX, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		namep = kstrdup(XATTR_SELINUX_SUFFIX, GFP_NOFS);
> >  		if (!namep)
> >  			return -ENOMEM;
> >  		*name = namep;
> 
> Might fix it.  But 2.6.24's inode_alloc_security() also uses GFP_KERNEL and
> doesn't have this bug.  What changed?

Looks legitimate, although we've been doing that since Linux 2.6.0-test3
(selinux merge) for inode_alloc_security and d_instantiate, and since
Linux 2.6.14 for inode_init_security, so something is at least
triggering it more easily now.  inode_doinit_with_dentry looks like
another instance and security_context_to_sid_core as well.

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html