[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1JhOy1-0006g8-Oy@closure.thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 08:54:57 -0400
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: "Jose R. Santos" <jrs@...ibm.com>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Bug in ext2fs_set_gdt_csum() and uninit_groups handling
Unfortunately, this has already been merged into the mainline branch
before I noticed this, but we have a nasty bug right now in the
uninit_groups handling. Note this code here in ext2fs_set_gdt_csum():
/* Even if it wasn't zeroed, by the time this function is
* called by e2fsck we have already scanned and corrected
* the whole inode table so we may as well not overwrite it.
* This is just a hint to the kernel that it could do lazy
* zeroing of the inode table if mke2fs didn't do it, to help
* out if we need to do a full itable scan sometime later. */
if (!(bg->bg_flags & (EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT |
EXT2_BG_INODE_ZEROED)))
fs->group_desc[i].bg_flags |= EXT2_BG_INODE_ZEROED;
There's only one problem. ext2fs_set_gdt_csum() is also called by
mke2fs, so all of the block groups are having the EXT2_BG_INODE_ZEROED
bit set.
I'm also not entirely sure this is safe for e2fsck, since as far as I
can tell, e2fsck does *not* currently scan zero uninitialized portions
of the inode table. It uses the ext2fs_get_next_inode() function, which
will skip uninitialized inodes.
So, I think what needs to happen is that the above fragment in
csum.c:ext2fs_set_gdt_csum() needs to disappear.
Is there a kernel patch that will zero out the inode tables in the
background? I remember hearing discussions of this, but it doesn't seem
to be in the kernel tree or in the ext4 patch queue.
Eventually, we might want to add a feature to e2fsck (probably
controlled by e2fsck.conf or a command-line option?) to zero out the
inode table, and then we can clear the INODE_ZERO'ed bg_flags.
Jose, Andreas, does this make sense?
- Ted
P.S. I noticed this because I had added to dumpe2fs the ability to show
the INODE_ZEROED flag, and noticed it was set when I was *not* expecting
it to be set.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists