linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: update ctime and mtime for truncate with extents.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1207802397.3616.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:39:57 -0700
From:	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
To:	Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@...s-3g.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: update ctime and mtime for truncate with extents.

On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 10:43 +0200, Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net wrote:
> ext4: update ctime and mtime for truncate with extents.
> 
> From: Solofo Ramangalahy <Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net>
> 
> The recently announced "Linux POSIX file system test suite"
> catched a truncate issue when using extents:
> mtime and ctime are not updated when truncate is successful.
> 
> This is the single issue catched with "default" ext4 (mkfs and mount
> with minimal options).
> The testsuite does not report failure with -o noextents.
> 
> With the following patch, all tests of the testsuite passes.
> 
Thanks for the fix.

> Signed-off-by: Solofo Ramangalahy <Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net>
> 
> ---
>  fs/ext4/extents.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.25-rc8-git5-ext4-52c7a8013ad2c452551a68ff4daab4bacbe28f9d/fs/ext4/extents.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25-rc8-git5-ext4-52c7a8013ad2c452551a68ff4daab4bacbe28f9d.orig/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ linux-2.6.25-rc8-git5-ext4-52c7a8013ad2c452551a68ff4daab4bacbe28f9d/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -2947,6 +2947,7 @@ out_stop:
>  		ext4_orphan_del(handle, inode);
> 
>  	up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> +	inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = ext4_current_time(inode);

Shouldn't we mark inode dirty after the ctime and and mtime is changed?

>  	ext4_journal_stop(handle);
>  }
> 

Regards,
Mingming
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html