lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080419144952.GM20637@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:49:52 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	kernelnewbies-bounce@...linux.org
Subject: Re: script to find incorrect tests on unsigneds

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:08:55PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> I found 63 occurrences of this problem with the following semantic match
> (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/):
> 
> @@ unsigned int i; @@
> 
> * i < 0
> 
> I looked through all of the results by hand, and they all seem to be 
> problems.  In many cases, it seems like the variable should not be 
> unsigned as it is used to hold the return value of a function that might 
> return a negative error code, but I haven't looked into this in detail.
> 
> In the output below, the lines that begin with a single start contain a 
> test of whether an unsigned variable or structure field is less than 0.
> The output is actually generated with diff, but I converted the -s to *s 
> to avoid confusion.

> diff -u -p a/fs/ext3/inode.c b/fs/ext3/inode.c
> *** a/fs/ext3/inode.c 2008-03-12 14:13:14.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static int ext3_ordered_write_end(struct
>  			EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
>  		copied = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
>  							page, fsdata);
> *		if (copied < 0)
>  			ret = copied;
>  	}
>  	ret2 = ext3_journal_stop(handle);
> @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static int ext3_writeback_write_end(stru
>  
>  	copied = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
>  							page, fsdata);
> *	if (copied < 0)
>  		ret = copied;
>  
>  	ret2 = ext3_journal_stop(handle);
> diff -u -p a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> *** a/fs/ext4/inode.c 2008-03-12 14:13:14.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ static int ext4_ordered_write_end(struct
>  			EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
>  		copied = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
>  							page, fsdata);
> *		if (copied < 0)
>  			ret = copied;
>  	}
>  	ret2 = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> @@ -1331,7 +1331,7 @@ static int ext4_writeback_write_end(stru
>  
>  	copied = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
>  							page, fsdata);
> *	if (copied < 0)
>  		ret = copied;
>  
>  	ret2 = ext4_journal_stop(handle);

Fix comparisons of an unsigned int against 0

It's not really feasible to change 'copied' into a signed int, and while
we could cast it for the purposes of this comparison, I think this
rearrangement of the tests is actually clearer than the original.

Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>

diff --git a/fs/ext3/inode.c b/fs/ext3/inode.c
index eb95670..60f504b 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/inode.c
@@ -1261,18 +1261,16 @@ static int ext3_ordered_write_end(struct file *file,
 		new_i_size = pos + copied;
 		if (new_i_size > EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize)
 			EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
-		copied = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
+		ret = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
 							page, fsdata);
-		if (copied < 0)
-			ret = copied;
 	}
 	ret2 = ext3_journal_stop(handle);
-	if (!ret)
+	if (ret >= 0 && ret2)
 		ret = ret2;
 	unlock_page(page);
 	page_cache_release(page);
 
-	return ret ? ret : copied;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int ext3_writeback_write_end(struct file *file,
@@ -1289,18 +1287,15 @@ static int ext3_writeback_write_end(struct file *file,
 	if (new_i_size > EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize)
 		EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
 
-	copied = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
+	ret = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
 							page, fsdata);
-	if (copied < 0)
-		ret = copied;
-
 	ret2 = ext3_journal_stop(handle);
-	if (!ret)
+	if (ret >= 0 && ret2)
 		ret = ret2;
 	unlock_page(page);
 	page_cache_release(page);
 
-	return ret ? ret : copied;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int ext3_journalled_write_end(struct file *file,
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 945cbf6..69b29c6 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1301,18 +1301,16 @@ static int ext4_ordered_write_end(struct file *file,
 		new_i_size = pos + copied;
 		if (new_i_size > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)
 			EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
-		copied = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
+		ret = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
 							page, fsdata);
-		if (copied < 0)
-			ret = copied;
 	}
 	ret2 = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
-	if (!ret)
+	if (ret >= 0 && ret2)
 		ret = ret2;
 	unlock_page(page);
 	page_cache_release(page);
 
-	return ret ? ret : copied;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int ext4_writeback_write_end(struct file *file,
@@ -1329,18 +1327,16 @@ static int ext4_writeback_write_end(struct file *file,
 	if (new_i_size > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)
 		EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
 
-	copied = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
+	ret = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
 							page, fsdata);
-	if (copied < 0)
-		ret = copied;
 
 	ret2 = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
-	if (!ret)
+	if (ret >= 0 && ret2)
 		ret = ret2;
 	unlock_page(page);
 	page_cache_release(page);
 
-	return ret ? ret : copied;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int ext4_journalled_write_end(struct file *file,

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ