[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080421131117.GE9700@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:11:17 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To: "Jose R. Santos" <jrs@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ininitial e2fsprogs TODO list (please expand)
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 07:47:07PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Some of the items marked "DONE" are in my tree and haven't been pushed
> out yet, but I'll make sure that happens by Monday. Note that I am
> taking the red eye from Sao Paulo tonight, and if all goes well, am
> scheduled to arrive in Boston at 10:15am Eastern. If the flight gets
> delayed, there is a chance that I may end up being late or missing the
> ext4 call.
Unfortunately, we were delayed in Sao Paulo for over three hours;
something about a problem with one of the fuel pumps.... So I've been
rebooked onto another flight which means I'll be in the air at the
time of the ext4 call.
While I was stuck on the airplane, I spent some time doing more fixups
on the uninit_bg code to make it much cleaner and more robust, and I
also started rototilling the undo_mgr patches.
In addition to fixing numerous style and usability problems, I also
found the design problem which caused it to be so slow. It is using
the first blocksize used to write to the device as the tdb_data_size.
For mke2fs, this is 512 bytes, which means that for every single 4k
inode table clock write, *eight* entries were getting made into the
tdb database and the old contents of the filesystem were getting
stored in 512 byte chunks. No wonder it was so slow!! I was able to
show significant speedups by forcing the tdb_data_size to be the
filesystem blocksize, and I suspect that for mke2fs, if it is
initializing the inode table, using a tdb_data_size of something like
32k or 64k would be even better.
Unfortunately I haven't made any progress on doing quality checking
the patches in the patch queue, since I found so much new code that
just screamed out for fixing in e2fsprogs. Eric, if you have time,
could you look through the patch queue and help out with
sanity-checking the patches and making sure the patch descriptions are
suitably well-written without version control logs, XXX FIXME
comments, or other things that would make Linus vomit? If you could,
I'd really appreciate it. Thanks!!
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists