linux-ext4 - Re: 2.6.25-git2: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffffffffff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804211407370.2779@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, paulmck@...ibm.com,
	jirislaby@...il.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-git2: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
 ffffffffffffffff



On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, David Miller wrote:
> 
> Do we know the offset within the object at which this all 1's
> value is found?
> 
> My rough calculations show that on 32-bit that expect->mask member is
> at offset 56 and on 64-bit it should be at offset 72.  Does that
> match up to the offset of the filp or whatever bit being corrupted?

No, I think that the d_hash list is at offset 24 (64-bit).

But that changes if any of

 - GENERIC_LOCKBREAK
 - DEBUG_SPINLOCK
 - DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC (and if so, LOCK_STAT)

is set, and then you might actually get to 72.

However, the Code: line for one of the oopses shows that in that 
particular case, it was at offset 0x18 (ie the normal 24), so at least one 
of the oopses had no such thing going on.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html