[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080425155953.GA11243@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:59:53 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, zdenek.kabelac@...il.com,
rjw@...k.pl, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, clameter@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
pageexec@...email.hu, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: fix text_poke
* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
> Woooow, just a sec here. I removed the atomicity test _because_ there
> happen to be a case where it's safe to do non-atomic instruction
> modification. If we do :
>
> 1) replace the instruction first byte by a breakpoint, execute an
> instruction bypass (see the immediate values patches for detail)
> 2) modify the instruction non-atomically
> 3) put back the original instruction first byte.
>
> That's why I removed the BUG_ONs at the beginning of the function.
> That's also why it's required to deal with page crossing.
but the code as-is is nonsensical. It checks for:
BUG_ON(len > sizeof(long));
but then deals with page crossing...
it should also rename text_poke_early() to text_poke_core(), and call
_that_ from text_poke() if core_kernel_text(). From that alone the whole
poke_text() function would look a whole lot cleaner.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists