linux-ext4 - Re: jbd2 patches in stable queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1209414300.13477.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:25:00 -0700
From:	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: jbd2 patches in stable queue

On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 15:07 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Ted et al:
> 
> these 3 patches in the stable queue:
> 
> patches/jbd2-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialization-and-destruction.patch
> patches/jbd2-eliminate-duplicated-code-in-revocation-table-init-destroy-functions.patch
> patches/jbd2-replace-potentially-false-assertion-with-if-block.patch
> 
> don't seem to have their jbd counterparts merged anywhere, -mm or Linus'
> tree.
> 
As far as I remember, they(at least the first 2) used to be in mm tree
then later when the author submit updated patches, Andrew got confused
with the relationship with previous patches so he took them all out. 

Mingming

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html