linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH, RFC] ext3: move headers out of include/linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805011134520.5994@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 1 May 2008 11:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....EDU>
cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] ext3: move headers out of include/linux



On Thu, 1 May 2008, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
>  fs/ext3/acl.c              |    4 +-
>  fs/ext3/balloc.c           |    5 +-
>  fs/ext3/bitmap.c           |    2 +-
>  fs/ext3/dir.c              |    3 +-
>  fs/ext3/ext3.h             |  897 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/ext3/ext3_i.h           |  147 ++++++++
>  fs/ext3/ext3_jbd.c         |    7 +-
>  fs/ext3/ext3_jbd.h         |  225 +++++++++++
>  fs/ext3/ext3_sb.h          |   86 +++++
>  fs/ext3/file.c             |    5 +-
>  fs/ext3/fsync.c            |    5 +-
>  fs/ext3/hash.c             |    3 +-
>  fs/ext3/ialloc.c           |    5 +-
>  fs/ext3/inode.c            |    4 +-
>  fs/ext3/ioctl.c            |    5 +-
>  fs/ext3/namei.c            |    5 +-
>  fs/ext3/resize.c           |    6 +-
>  fs/ext3/super.c            |    5 +-
>  fs/ext3/symlink.c          |    3 +-
>  fs/ext3/xattr.c            |    4 +-
>  fs/ext3/xattr_security.c   |    4 +-
>  fs/ext3/xattr_trusted.c    |    4 +-
>  fs/ext3/xattr_user.c       |    5 +-
>  include/linux/ext3_fs.h    |  896 -------------------------------------------
>  include/linux/ext3_fs_i.h  |  147 --------
>  include/linux/ext3_fs_sb.h |   86 -----
>  include/linux/ext3_jbd.h   |  226 -----------

I'd suggest not sending out patches like this.

If the patch is largely a rename one, and sent out for review, just use 
"git diff -M -p --stat --summary", because it's going to be a *lot* more 
reviewable that way.

Yeah, it means that people need git to apply it, but by now we can 
probably take that for granted - and more importantly, even if they don't 
have git installed: when you send out of RFC, aren't you looking for 
commentary more than people to apply and test it?

And then the patch saying that it's a rename (with perhaps changes to the 
guard #ifdef thing) would be a lot more clear. Nobody is going to read a 
patch that is 2800 lines of mostly create/delete with presumably almost no 
actual changes?

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html