linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH, RFC] ext3: move headers out of include/linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080501153032.GA10754@lst.de>
Date:	Thu, 1 May 2008 17:30:32 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....EDU>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	olaf@...fle.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] ext3: move headers out of include/linux

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:40:37AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Secondly, Christoph, was there a reason why you didn't unpublish
> ext2_fs.h when you unpublished ext3_fs.h?  Are there a significant
> number of userspace prorams using it?  I don't care, because e2fsprogs
> doesn't use it, and as far as I'm concerned I'd much rather encourage
> people to use ext2fs/ext2_fs.h from e2fsprogs instead.  And this would
> allow us to do a similar patch for fs/ext2; but assume you had found
> some significant number of applications that would break if we
> unexported and moved linux/ext2_fs.h?

ext2_fs.h has been there for much longer, and unlike ext3_fs.h it
actually is useable by userpsace.  Of course everyone should be using
the headers from e2fsprogs by now, but I'm not sure if that's really the
case.

In past cases like that Olaf did greps over the whole OpenSuSE tree,
so maybe he could do it for this aswell?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html