[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080512150550.GF7029@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:05:50 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: "Jose R. Santos" <jrs@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/9][e2fsprogs] Add 64-bit closefs interface.
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:40:19AM -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
> From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@...ibm.com>
>
> Add 64-bit closefs interface.
>
> Add new ext2fs_super_and_bgd_loc2() that returns blk64_t pointers.
> The function now returns the number of blocks used by super block and
> group descriptors since with flex_bg, it can no longer be assumed that
> bitmaps and inode tables still resided within the block group.
This change makes me nervous, because (a) I need to assure myself that
ext2fs_super_and_bgd_loc() is going to always do the right thing, and
(b) the changes to the callers of ext2fs_super_and_bgd_loc2() aren't
also described.
So this requires more thought. One change I would make is to return
the number of blocks via a pointer rather than through a straight
return value. And also, if I recall correctly, nothing is actually
using the ret_meta_bg pointer, so we might be able to drop that in the
_2 version. of the interface.
We should probably include in this patch series the callers of
ext2fs_super_and_bgd_loc() and assure ourselves that the new interface
actually works correctly and is clean for the users before we finalize
the interface change.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists