lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72c5d9a0805121030y709de9cehc01df8aeb5b1b8d3@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 May 2008 11:30:03 -0600
From:	"Eric A" <erpo41@...il.com>
To:	"Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:	"ext4 development" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: barriers off by default?

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:
> As I look at my shiny new 500G disks with 32MB of cache, I find myself
>  wondering why the default for ext3 and ext4 is to have barriers disabled.
>
>  This is a pretty dangerous default w.r.t. filesystem integrity on power
>  loss, no?

>From reading the documentation, I was under the impression that write
barriers don't always do what they're supposed to do.

Cheers,
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ