[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080513045028.GC22226@linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 05:50:29 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@...il.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext4dev build failure on mips: "empty_zero_page" undefined
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 06:46:21PM +0400, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
> > What is the Linux-mips' team preference for feeding this patch to
> > Linus? This technically isn't a regression, since it was broken in
> > 2.6.25, but it would be nice to get this to Linus sooner rather than
> > later. Should I push it with a batch of ext4 fixes, or do you want to
> > push it via the mips tree? (Davem asked me to push the sparc export
> > via ext4, while the ppc arch, it went via the ppc tree. So whichever
> > is your preference; I'm easy. :-)
> >
> > - Ted
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> Normally I push my patches via the mips tree, and now I'm Cc:ing Ralf for that.
>
> Hopefully Ralf will react quickly. :)
I prefer to do it myself so I can apply it at the same time to the MIPS
-stable branches.
I'm a little irriated that this thread seems to be only about
empty_zero_page but apparently not zero_page_mask? empty_zero_page is
actualy an array of pages on MIPS and ZERO_PAGE() will pick the right one
for a particular user space mapping based on the virtual address but
ZERO_PAGE() also references zero_page_mask. So I sense more brokenness
here.
Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists