lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 21 May 2008 13:51:09 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, sandeen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Delayed allocation and page_lock vs transaction start ordering

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Hi,
> 
>   I've ported my patch inversing locking ordering of page_lock and
> transaction start to ext4 (on top of ext4 patch queue). Everything except
> delayed allocation is converted (the patch is below for interested
> readers). The question is how to proceed with delayed allocation. Its
> current implementation in VFS is designed to work well with the old
> ordering (page lock first, then start a transaction). We could bend it to
> work with the new locking ordering but I really see no point since ext4 is
> the only user. Also XFS has AFAIK ordering first start transaction, then
> lock pages so if we should ever merge delayed alloc implementations the new
> ordering would make it easier.
>   So what do people think here? Do you agree with reimplementing current
> mpage_da_... functions? Eric, I guess you have the best clue how XFS does
> this, do you have some advices? Also maybe pointers into XFS code would be
> useful if it is reasonably readable :). Thanks.
> 
> 								Honza


[....snip....]

>   */
> -static int ext4_ordered_writepage(struct page *page,
> +static int __ext4_ordered_writepage(struct page *page,
>  				struct writeback_control *wbc)
>  {
>  	struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> @@ -1723,22 +1694,6 @@ static int ext4_ordered_writepage(struct page *page,
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	int err;
> 
> -	J_ASSERT(PageLocked(page));
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * We give up here if we're reentered, because it might be for a
> -	 * different filesystem.
> -	 */
> -	if (ext4_journal_current_handle())
> -		goto out_fail;
> -
> -	handle = ext4_journal_start(inode, ext4_writepage_trans_blocks(inode));
> -
> -	if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(handle);
> -		goto out_fail;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (!page_has_buffers(page)) {
>  		create_empty_buffers(page, inode->i_sb->s_blocksize,
>  				(1 << BH_Dirty)|(1 << BH_Uptodate));
> @@ -1762,114 +1717,139 @@ static int ext4_ordered_writepage(struct page *page,
>  	 * and generally junk.
>  	 */
>  	if (ret == 0) {
> -		err = walk_page_buffers(handle, page_bufs, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE,
> +		handle = ext4_journal_start(inode,
> +					ext4_writepage_trans_blocks(inode));
> +		if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(handle);
> +			goto out_put;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = walk_page_buffers(handle, page_bufs, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE,
>  					NULL, jbd2_journal_dirty_data_fn);
> +		err = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
>  		if (!ret)
>  			ret = err;
>  	}
> -	walk_page_buffers(handle, page_bufs, 0,
> -			PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, NULL, bput_one);
> -	err = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> -	if (!ret)
> -		ret = err;
> +out_put:
> +	walk_page_buffers(handle, page_bufs, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, NULL,
> +			  bput_one);
>  	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int ext4_ordered_writepage(struct page *page,
> +				struct writeback_control *wbc)
> +{
> +	J_ASSERT(PageLocked(page));
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We give up here if we're reentered, because it might be for a
> +	 * different filesystem.
> +	 */
> +	if (!ext4_journal_current_handle())
> +		return __ext4_ordered_writepage(page, wbc);
> 
> -out_fail:
>  	redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
>  	unlock_page(page);
> -	return ret;
> +	return 0;
>  }


How about change below to make sure we don't have a deadlock.

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 9d1d07b..85de163 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1718,6 +1718,10 @@ static int jbd2_journal_dirty_data_fn(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int ext4_bh_unmapped(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+	return !buffer_mapped(bh);
+}
 /*
  * Note that we don't need to start a transaction unless we're journaling
  * data because we should have holes filled from ext4_page_mkwrite(). If
@@ -1767,20 +1771,33 @@ static int jbd2_journal_dirty_data_fn(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
  * us.
  *
  */
-static int __ext4_ordered_writepage(struct page *page,
-				struct writeback_control *wbc)
+static int __ext4_ordered_alloc_and_writepage(struct page *page,
+				struct writeback_control *wbc, int alloc)
 {
-	struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
-	struct buffer_head *page_bufs;
+	int ret = 0, err;
+	unsigned long len;
 	handle_t *handle = NULL;
-	int ret = 0;
-	int err;
+	struct buffer_head *page_bufs;
+	struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
+	loff_t size = i_size_read(inode);
 
 	if (!page_has_buffers(page)) {
 		create_empty_buffers(page, inode->i_sb->s_blocksize,
 				(1 << BH_Dirty)|(1 << BH_Uptodate));
 	}
 	page_bufs = page_buffers(page);
+
+	if (page->index == size >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT)
+		len = size & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK;
+	else
+		len = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
+
+	if (!alloc && walk_page_buffers(NULL, page_bufs, 0,
+					len, NULL, ext4_bh_unmapped)) {
+		printk(KERN_CRIT "%s called with unmapped buffer\n",
+								__func__);
+		BUG();
+	}
 	walk_page_buffers(handle, page_bufs, 0,
 			PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, NULL, bget_one);
 
@@ -1828,7 +1845,7 @@ static int ext4_ordered_writepage(struct page *page,
 	 * different filesystem.
 	 */
 	if (!ext4_journal_current_handle())
-		return __ext4_ordered_writepage(page, wbc);
+		return __ext4_ordered_alloc_and_writepage(page, wbc, 0);
 
 	redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
 	unlock_page(page);
@@ -3777,10 +3794,6 @@ int ext4_change_inode_journal_flag(struct inode *inode, int val)
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int ext4_bh_unmapped(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
-{
-	return !buffer_mapped(bh);
-}
 
 int ext4_page_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page)
 {
@@ -3837,7 +3850,7 @@ int ext4_page_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page)
 	if (ext4_should_writeback_data(inode))
 		ret = __ext4_writeback_writepage(page, &wbc);
 	else if (ext4_should_order_data(inode))
-		ret = __ext4_ordered_writepage(page, &wbc);
+		ret = __ext4_ordered_alloc_and_writepage(page, &wbc, 1);
 	else
 		ret = __ext4_journalled_writepage(page, &wbc);
 	/* Page got unlocked in writepage */



ie we call __ext4_ordered_alloc_and_writepage with alloc = 1 only in
case of page_mkwrite. All the other case we should have all the buffer
heads mapped. Otherwise we will try to allocate new blocks which starts
a new transaction holding page lock.

> 
> -static int ext4_writeback_writepage(struct page *page,
> +static int __ext4_writeback_writepage(struct page *page,
>  				struct writeback_control *wbc)
>  {
>  	struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> +
> +	if (test_opt(inode->i_sb, NOBH))
> +		return nobh_writepage(page, ext4_get_block, wbc);
> +	else
> +		return block_write_full_page(page, ext4_get_block, wbc);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int ext4_writeback_writepage(struct page *page,
> +				struct writeback_control *wbc)
> +{
> +	if (!ext4_journal_current_handle())
> +		return __ext4_writeback_writepage(page, wbc);
> +
> +	redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
> +	unlock_page(page);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __ext4_journalled_writepage(struct page *page,
> +				struct writeback_control *wbc)
> +{
> +	struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
> +	struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> +	struct buffer_head *page_bufs;
>  	handle_t *handle = NULL;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	int err;
> 
> -	if (ext4_journal_current_handle())
> -		goto out_fail;
> +	ret = block_prepare_write(page, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, ext4_get_block);
> +	if (ret != 0)
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +
> +	page_bufs = page_buffers(page);
> +	walk_page_buffers(handle, page_bufs, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, NULL,
> +								bget_one);
> +	/* As soon as we unlock the page, it can go away, but we have
> +	 * references to buffers so we are safe */
> +	unlock_page(page);
> 
>  	handle = ext4_journal_start(inode, ext4_writepage_trans_blocks(inode));
>  	if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(handle);
> -		goto out_fail;
> +		goto out;
>  	}
> 
> -	if (test_opt(inode->i_sb, NOBH) && ext4_should_writeback_data(inode))
> -		ret = nobh_writepage(page, ext4_get_block, wbc);
> -	else
> -		ret = block_write_full_page(page, ext4_get_block, wbc);
> +	ret = walk_page_buffers(handle, page_bufs, 0,
> +			PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, NULL, do_journal_get_write_access);
> 
> +	err = walk_page_buffers(handle, page_bufs, 0,
> +				PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, NULL, write_end_fn);
> +	if (ret == 0)
> +		ret = err;
>  	err = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
>  	if (!ret)
>  		ret = err;
> -	return ret;
> 
> -out_fail:
> -	redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
> +	walk_page_buffers(handle, page_bufs, 0,
> +				PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, NULL, bput_one);
> +	EXT4_I(inode)->i_state |= EXT4_STATE_JDATA;
> +	goto out;
> +
> +out_unlock:
>  	unlock_page(page);
> +out:
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
>  static int ext4_journalled_writepage(struct page *page,
>  				struct writeback_control *wbc)
>  {
> -	struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> -	handle_t *handle = NULL;
> -	int ret = 0;
> -	int err;
> -
>  	if (ext4_journal_current_handle())
>  		goto no_write;
> 
> -	handle = ext4_journal_start(inode, ext4_writepage_trans_blocks(inode));
> -	if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(handle);
> -		goto no_write;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (!page_has_buffers(page) || PageChecked(page)) {


This will never happen with writepage right ? And we don't call 
ext4_journalled_writepage from page_mkwrite. So is this needed ?
If not __ext4_journalled_writepage can handle everything in a single
transaction right  and assume that it is called within a transaction.


>  		/*
>  		 * It's mmapped pagecache.  Add buffers and journal it.  There
>  		 * doesn't seem much point in redirtying the page here.
>  		 */
>  		ClearPageChecked(page);
> -		ret = block_prepare_write(page, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE,
> -					ext4_get_block);
> -		if (ret != 0) {
> -			ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> -			goto out_unlock;
> -		}
> -		ret = walk_page_buffers(handle, page_buffers(page), 0,
> -			PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, NULL, do_journal_get_write_access);
> -
> -		err = walk_page_buffers(handle, page_buffers(page), 0,
> -				PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, NULL, write_end_fn);
> -		if (ret == 0)
> -			ret = err;
> -		EXT4_I(inode)->i_state |= EXT4_STATE_JDATA;
> -		unlock_page(page);
> +		return __ext4_journalled_writepage(page, wbc);
>  	} else {
>  		/*
>  		 * It may be a page full of checkpoint-mode buffers.  We don't
>  		 * really know unless we go poke around in the buffer_heads.
>  		 * But block_write_full_page will do the right thing.
>  		 */
> -		ret = block_write_full_page(page, ext4_get_block, wbc);
> +		return block_write_full_page(page, ext4_get_block, wbc);
>  	}
> -	err = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> -	if (!ret)
> -		ret = err;
> -out:
> -	return ret;
> -
>  no_write:
>  	redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
> -out_unlock:
>  	unlock_page(page);
> -	goto out;
> +	return 0;
>  }
> 

-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ