[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080526175109.GA14718@skywalker>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 23:21:09 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: cmm@...ibm.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext4 lock ordering patch
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 07:34:52PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi Mingming,
>
> I've noticed you removed the patch reversing locking order of page lock
> and transaction start from ext4 patch queue. Was this because of that
> reported performance problem or for some other reason? As far as I've
> understood that problem has been just in the patch fixing the delalloc mode
> part so just removing that patch would be enough AFAICT.
> Anyway, the problem is I have now ordered mode rewrite for JBD2/ext4
> which depends on this patch so the question is how to proceed... Should we
> first fix that delalloc problem (are you looking into that?) or do we merge
> all the changes and then fixup the delalloc code?
>
> Honza
That was due to delalloc interaction with locking order change patches.
I am right now testing some changes for delalloc. But I still have file
system hang with fsstress. So I haven't posted the latest changes yet.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists