[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0806030020310.6160@sheep.housecafe.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 00:23:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e2fsck: Device or resource busy
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
> The key thing that you need to do when trying to recover from RAID
> setups where you are missing one or more disks is to align the pieces
> so they are in their original places, with the missing pieces replaced
> with a /dev/zero device.
Hm, interesting, I did not consider that yet. Thanks for the links, I'll
have a look. But again: I don't really care for the data, I was just
playing around and wondering why it reported "Device or resource busy"
when I expected something like "unable to find superblock".
> (I'm assuming here you were using software RAID; if this was a
Yes, it was software RAID.
Thanks again,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #112:
The monitor is plugged into the serial port
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists