| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:41:00 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> To: Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@...l.net> CC: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Test results for ext4 Valerie Clement wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote: >> This was with e2fsprogs-1.39 for ext3, e2fsprogs-1.40.10 for ext4, and >> xfsprogs-2.9.8 for xfs. > I was using xfsprogs-2.9.0, maybe too old version... > I'm updating them and I'll run my tests again. 2.9.0 is about a year old... 2.9.5 got some defaults changes for perfomance reasons, so it might make a difference. If kernel is bleeding edge probably might as well use all bleeding-edge tools, too. :) ... > I added a link to the scripts I used in the test description section in: > http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080530/ffsb-write-2.6.26-rc2.html > http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080530/ffsb-readwrite-2.6.26-rc2.html Great, thanks! I think the hardware comparison is interesting... -Eric > Valérie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists