linux-ext4 - Re: Test results for ext4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4846B78C.3020102@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:41:00 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@...l.net>
CC:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Test results for ext4

Valerie Clement wrote:
> Eric Sandeen wrote:

>> This was with e2fsprogs-1.39 for ext3, e2fsprogs-1.40.10 for ext4, and
>> xfsprogs-2.9.8 for xfs.
> I was using xfsprogs-2.9.0, maybe too old version...
> I'm updating them and I'll run my tests again.

2.9.0 is about a year old... 2.9.5 got some defaults changes for
perfomance reasons, so it might make a difference.  If kernel is
bleeding edge probably might as well use all bleeding-edge tools, too.  :)

...

> I added a link to the scripts I used in the test description section in:
> http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080530/ffsb-write-2.6.26-rc2.html
> http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080530/ffsb-readwrite-2.6.26-rc2.html

Great, thanks!  I think the hardware comparison is interesting...

-Eric

>    Valérie

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html