[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20080605053043.GO2961@webber.adilger.int>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:30:43 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, duaneg@...da.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + ext2-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent.patch
added to -mm tree
On Jun 04, 2008 21:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> +/* Flags that should be inherited by new inodes from their parent. */
> +#define EXT2_FL_INHERITED ~(EXT2_DIRTY_FL | EXT2_ECOMPR_FL | EXT2_BTREE_FL |\
> + EXT2_INDEX_FL | EXT2_IMAGIC_FL | EXT2_TOPDIR_FL)
This doesn't make things much better, unless it is just as a stop-gap
measure to get into the kernel while there is more discussion about which
flags need to be inherited... Duane did mention follow-up patches, so
I have no real objection to this patch as-is, so long as we don't consider
the matter closed.
Minor nit - "EXT2_BTREE_FL" is the long-deprecated name for "EXT2_INDEX_FL",
so we may as well just avoid it entirely here.
Yes, this patch avoids a few more of the cases that are bad, but will
again be incorrect as soon as some new flag enters use.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists