[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <484D95CF.9020801@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:42:55 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Alex Tomas <alex@....com>
Subject: __set_bit for BH flags in ext4_ext_get_blocks?
I was wondering why ext4_ext_get_blocks calls things like:
__set_bit(BH_Unwritten, &bh_result->b_state);
__set_bit(BH_New, &bh_result->b_state);
__set_bit(BH_Mapped, &bh_result->b_state);
instead of set_buffer_unwritten, etc.
Is there any reason it's calling __set_bit instead of set_bit (via the
BUFFER_FNS macros)?
Thanks,
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists