lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:42:55 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Alex Tomas <alex@....com>
Subject: __set_bit for BH flags in ext4_ext_get_blocks?

I was wondering why ext4_ext_get_blocks calls things like:

__set_bit(BH_Unwritten, &bh_result->b_state);
__set_bit(BH_New, &bh_result->b_state);
__set_bit(BH_Mapped, &bh_result->b_state);

instead of set_buffer_unwritten, etc.

Is there any reason it's calling __set_bit instead of set_bit (via the
BUFFER_FNS macros)?

Thanks,
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists