[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806121154090.27806@diagnostix.dwd.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:00:54 +0000 (GMT)
From: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@....de>
To: Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net
Cc: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@...com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Performance of ext4
Hello Solofo
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> Holger Kiehl writes:
> > That works until it comes to patch patches/ext4_ialloc-flexbg.patch when
> > it gets lots of rejects. So how do I set this up correctly?
>
> I think your quilt is set up correctly.
>
> The rejects probably come from the patch queue being based on a
> different version than 2.6.26-rc5.
>
> Which patchset did you use?
>
> What I do when wanting a patch queue for a specific kernel is to
> search for commit message indicating the rebase for this version.
>
> There is a "Rebase to linux-2.6.26-rc5" on
> http://repo.or.cz/w/ext4-patch-queue.git
> So the corresponding snapshot
> http://repo.or.cz/w/ext4-patch-queue.git?a=snapshot;h=ed6aaac3b0cc0ba47dbb2af0884306584271e5a2;sf=tgz
> patches 2.6.26-rc5 smoothly.
> (the last patchset also applies, with offset and fuzz, though)
>
Yes, that is the one I took. Just to make sure, I downloaded it again (and
the linux-2.6.26-rc5 tree) and now it works. When I compare the two patchsets
the one I pulled this morning had patches from 7 June and this one has more
and they are from 11th June.
Thanks a lot for your help, at last I now have all the patches and can go
on with testing.
Thanks,
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists