lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:00:54 +0000 (GMT)
From:	Holger Kiehl <>
Cc:	Nick Dokos <>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <>,,
	linux-kernel <>
Subject: Re: Performance of ext4 

Hello Solofo

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, wrote:

> Hi Holger,
> Holger Kiehl writes:
> > That works until it comes to patch patches/ext4_ialloc-flexbg.patch when
> > it gets lots of rejects. So how do I set this up correctly?
> I think your quilt is set up correctly.
> The rejects probably come from the patch queue being based on a
> different version than 2.6.26-rc5.
> Which patchset did you use?
> What I do when wanting a patch queue for a specific kernel is to
> search for commit message indicating the rebase for this version.
> There is a "Rebase to linux-2.6.26-rc5" on
> So the corresponding snapshot
> patches 2.6.26-rc5 smoothly.
> (the last patchset also applies, with offset and fuzz, though)
Yes, that is the one I took. Just to make sure, I downloaded it again (and
the linux-2.6.26-rc5 tree) and now it works. When I compare the two patchsets
the one I pulled this morning had patches from 7 June and this one has more
and they are from 11th June.

Thanks a lot for your help, at last I now have all the patches and can go
on with testing.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists