[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1213360423.9222.41.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:33:43 +0200
From: Frédéric Bohé <frederic.bohe@...l.net>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix online resize group descriptors corruption
Ted,
Concerning flex_bg and uninit_bg : it's currently not possible to resize
a filesystem with those features. It seems there are issues with
resize2fs.
We have also used nomballoc switch when mounting because of the oops
when unmounting.
We have tried both physical hard disk drive and loop back devices.
We have tested several filesystem resize with few (adding 1 group) to
many (adding 250 groups) more groups. All give correct group descriptors
using dump2fs and no problem when writing files and unmounting
filesystems.
This is a typical test case:
mkfs.ext4 -E test_fs -O ^flex_bg /dev/sdc1 10M
mount -t ext4dev -o nomballoc /dev/sdc1 /mnt/test
dumpe2fs /dev/sdc1
resize2fs /dev/sdc1 100M
dumpe2fs /dev/sdc1
dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/test/data bs=95M count=1
umount /mnt/test
fsck.ext4 -f /dev/sdc1
This test being run for several sizes of filesystem (from 10M with 1K
blocks to 1G with 4K blocks).
Let me know if we have missed something or if you want more testings.
Regards
Le jeudi 12 juin 2008 à 15:04 -0400, Theodore Tso a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:42:34AM +0200, Frédéric Bohé wrote:
> > From: Frederic Bohe <frederic.bohe@...l.net>
>
> Frederic,
>
> Many thanks! How much testing have you done with the patch? Does it
> fix growing the filesystems from a filesystem with say, 18 block
> groups to 32 block groups? Have you tried with with different
> filesystem features, including with and without flex_bg and uninit_bg?
>
> Regards,
>
> - Ted
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists