| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:59:30 From: Gary Hawco <ghawco@....net> To: "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Ordered data mode vs. writeback mode Noticed that the newest set of patches in ext4-patch-queue has ordered data mode as the default mode again. Tune2fs is now able to switch modes again. What is the preferred mode for a home desktop system with ext4? Is writeback still the fastest, but ordered data has more data integrity? And does delalloc only work when writeback is enabled? And does the commit=XX seconds still only work with writeback mode, ala ext3, or is it a valid option with ordered data mode? Trying to get an idea of the plethora of new options available with ext4. Keep up the good work! Gary -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists