lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20080616225930.01b86a60@pop.west.cox.net>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:59:30
From:	Gary Hawco <ghawco@....net>
To:	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Ordered data mode vs. writeback mode

Noticed that the newest set of patches in ext4-patch-queue has ordered data
mode as the default mode again. Tune2fs is now able to switch modes again.

What is the preferred mode for a home desktop system with ext4? Is
writeback still the fastest, but ordered data has more data integrity?  And
does delalloc only work when writeback is enabled? And does the commit=XX
seconds still only work with writeback mode, ala ext3, or is it a valid
option with ordered data mode?

Trying to get an idea of the plethora of new options available with ext4.

Keep up the good work!

Gary



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ