[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080619152500.GB2721@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:25:01 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: kerneloops.org: 2.6.26-rc possible regression in ext3
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:18:39AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 06:40:05AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>>> Expect a lot more of this to pop up in the future.
>>>> Should we #error for gcc 4.3.1?
>>> it/s better to find if the gcc guys made a testcase for this bug (they normally do) and
>>> test based on that.
>>
>> The gcc Bugzilla contains a testcase.
>>
>> But how do you plan to integrate it into a kernel build?
>
> we already have several of these.
> Just look at scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh for an example of such a beast.
Checking whether gcc supports some flags is easy.
But miscompilations are a different issue.
Especially since we also want to reject broken gcc versions for cross
compilations.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists