[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4860F0BC.1090404@hitachi.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:03:56 +0900
From: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, sct@...hat.com,
adilger@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz,
sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com>,
Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ext3: don't read inode block if the buffer has a
write error
Hi all,
Thank you for precious comments.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>What you want to do is not insane, but the way it is currently being
>>done is. As I said, just clearing the uptodate bit might blow up your
>>kernel pretty quickly from assertions in the vm. It should be going
>>through the whole truncate or invalidate page machinery in order to
>>do that.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> I would not mind, for example, leaving the uptodate bit, but removing it
> from the radix tree or something like that (ie turning it into an
> anonymous page for a page-cache page, just removing it from the
> hash-queues for a buffer_head).
If we move page caches with errors to another radix tree instead of
just removing, we may be able to do special handlings: rewrite once,
or check the page caches and get rid of them from user space, and so on.
> Of course, that could cause other problems (eg any VM assertions that
> shared mappings only contain non-anon pages).
As Jan and Nick stated, this seems to need a great effort, but I think
it is worthwhile to do.
Thanks,
--
Hidehiro Kawai
Hitachi, Systems Development Laboratory
Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists