[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080624171856.GH9959@duck.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:18:57 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Duane Griffin <duaneg@...da.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sct@...hat.com, adilger@...sterfs.com,
Sami Liedes <sliedes@...hut.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3: handle corrupted orphan list at mount
On Tue 24-06-08 18:16:21, Duane Griffin wrote:
> 2008/6/24 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>:
> >> + /*
> >> + * If the orphans has i_nlinks > 0 then it should be able to be
> >> + * truncated, otherwise it won't be removed from the orphan list
> >> + * during processing and an infinite loop will result.
> >> + */
> >> + if (inode->i_nlink && !ext3_can_truncate(inode))
> >> + goto bad_orphan;
> >> +
> > Maybe I miss something but shouldn't above rather be ||?
>
> No, it is correct. If i_nlink == 0 the orphan will be deleted in the
> cleanup loop by the iput. If i_nlink > 0 then ext3_truncate is called,
> which usually calls ext3_orphan_del on the way out, thereby removing
> the node from the orphan list. However, if it exits too early
> (basically if the ext3_can_truncate check fails, although there are
> other failure conditions such as OOM that can also cause it to exit
> early) then it doesn't, hence we end up in the infinite loop. So the
> check here says, if this node is not going to be deleted or truncated
> then it is invalid.
Ah, OK, I forgot that you want to handle also truncation without deletion
of the inode itself. Thanks for explanation.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists