[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20080627235428.GF6239@webber.adilger.int>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:54:28 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
To: Frédéric Bohé <frederic.bohe@...l.net>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix online resize with mballoc
On Jun 27, 2008 16:36 +0200, Fr�d�ric Boh� wrote:
> Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 17:26 -0600, Andreas Dilger a écrit :
> > On Jun 26, 2008 16:58 +0200, Fr�d�ric Boh� wrote:
> > > From: Frederic Bohe <frederic.bohe@...l.net>
> > > + num_meta_group_infos_max = num_meta_group_infos +
> > > + le16_to_cpu(es->s_reserved_gdt_blocks);
> >
> > The only drawback of NOT handling this properly is that once (eventually)
> > we allow resizing with META_BG this code will be broken again. It at
> > least deserves a comment like "Need to handle this properly when META_BG
> > resizing is allowed" so that it will show up on any grep for META_BG.
> >
> > It probably also makes sense to round this up to the next power-of-two
> > value, since kmalloc will do that internally anyways, and it gives us
> > some resizing headroom for no cost.
>
> Do you have any idea of how this headroom could be used in the future ?
For e.g. resize with META_BG, which does not need new reserved blocks
to be added. Since the space is already allocated because of kmalloc
use of 2^n slab size, we may as well make it "available" even if it isn't
used.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists