lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1215449732.1167.11.camel@alpha.linsyssoft.com>
Date:	Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:25:32 +0530
From:	Girish Shilamkar <Girish.Shilamkar@....COM>
To:	Ext4 Mailing List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	adilger@....COM, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [RFC] EXT_MAX_BLOCK for >= 16TB fs

Hi,
	The magic constant EXT_MAX_BLOCK = 0xffffffff in extents code is used
in some places to return "invalid block number", and to set the extent
length = "whole file" in other places.
	So with >= 16 TB fs we would prefer to use it differently. We can have
EXT_UNSET_BLOCK = 1 to indicate "invalid block number" as it will never
be valid block for allocation. And for "whole file" usecase we can
continue using current EXT_MAX_BLOCK

Regards,
Girish



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ