linux-ext4 - Re: error in ext4_mb_release_inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4872BD0C.9080404@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:04:12 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
CC:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: error in ext4_mb_release_inode_pa

Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jul 07, 2008  10:29 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> This was on #linuxfs last night, and I think I've seen at least one
>> other report of it:
>>
>> [22:44]  <shehjart> any ideas why i get the following two lines on the
>> serial console when writing to ext4 over software raid0:
>> [22:44]  <shehjart> pa e00001004112d450: logic 11928, phys. 47003288,
>> len 360
>> [22:45]  <shehjart> EXT4-fs error (device md0):
>> ext4_mb_release_inode_pa: free 176, pa_free 174
> 
> The bug that I recalled from Lustre is unlikely to be the same.  It is
> https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15932
> 
> 	"error: N blocks in bitmap, M in gd"
> 
> There was a second bug in ext3_mb_use_best_found() hit on > 8TB filesystems:
> https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16101
> 
> 	BUG_ON(ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group != e3b->bd_group);
> 

Thanks Andreas -

In an effort to not lose track of it I filed a bug:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11053

-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html