[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1KGT4q-0006fD-Jb@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:22:56 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: hch@...radead.org
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, tytso@....edu, pavel@...e.cz, hch@...radead.org,
t-sato@...jp.nec.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, mtk.manpages@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > This would mean that freeze and thaw will have to be done on the same
> > file descriptor, but this isn't unreasonable to expect, is it?
>
> It is certainly not the current use case, where you run one command
> to freeze the filesystem and another one to unfreeze it.
So instead of
freeze_fs mountpoint
backup-command
unfreeze_fs mountpoint
the user would have do to
run_freezed mountpoint backup-command
I find the second one nicer, regardless of any reliability issues.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists