[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1215648977.6978.7.camel@mingming-laptop>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:16:17 -0700
From: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
To: Gary Hawco <ghawco@....net>
Cc: "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Segfaults--they're back!
在 2008-07-09三的 15:00 +0000,Gary Hawco写道:
> Segfaults have returned with snapshots compiled after 070908--0010hrs GMT.
>
> That one worked fine.
>
> The next one I tried (070908/0025hrs GMT) caused segfaults in both Gentoo &
> Slackware (a first for Slackware) when trying to untar
> linux-2.6.26-rc9.tar.bz2 tarball)
>
> I then rolled back two snapshots to 070908/0012hrs GMT) and it segfaulted
> in both operating systems doing same untarring function.
>
> So, apparently, since 0010snapshot
> (ext4-patch-queue-bfb23cf4cd345552c774142cb10ac1225caf35f5.tar.gz) works fine
>
> and 0012snapshot
> (ext4-patch-queue-be66b0c5c3f4293176301c0ddcb8db95b0576cb4.tar.gz)
> segfaults, the
> Add ext4-fix-mb_find_next_bit-return.patch must be the culprit.
>
Thanks for reporting this,
commit be66b0c5c3f4293176301c0ddcb8db95b0576cb4 added
ext4-fix-mb_find_next_bit-return.patch
I have dropped this patch from patch queue, could you please check if
the segment fault goes away?
Mingming
> Thanks,
> Gary
>
> P.S. The latest snapshot from today @ 0303hrs GMT segfaults as well.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists