[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080710130220.GF8603@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:02:20 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@....de>,
Girish Shilamkar <Girish.Shilamkar@....com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Gary Hawco <ghawco@....net>
Subject: Re: Revert Fix-EXT_MAX_BLOCK.patch
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 06:08:03PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 08:22:42AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > Aneesh, for the record, how were you able to reproduce the problem?
> >
> > Do you have Holger's afdbench setup, or did you use some other workload?
> >
>
> cp -ax /usr .
>
> that will cause the BUG
Hmm, I wasn't able to trigger it so easily, at least, while trying to
replicate Gary Hawco's, bug. (Which also had Fix-EXT_MAX_BLOCK
applied.) I wonder if he wasn't able to trigger it while doing the
partial rollback, and so ext4-fix-mb_find_next_bit-return.patch was
unfairly blamed for the BUG.
In any case, both patches have been pulled out of the patch series ,
and I'll release a new patchset until we can figure out what happened.
(Gary, this is why its important to get the kernel BUG/oops message;
it helps us correlate your bug reports with others.)
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists