linux-ext4 - ext4 pre-allocation performance through nfsd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4881373C.10404@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Date:	Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:37:16 +1000
From:	Shehjar Tikoo <shehjart@....unsw.edu.au>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: ext4 pre-allocation performance  through nfsd

Hi All

FYI, I ran some performance tests for a feature that incorporates 
pre-allocation support into linux nfsd. The patch is a 
proof-of-concept but the measurements are still relevant for this list.

1. Sequential read throughput with iozone reading a file written
using various pre-allocation sizes through nfsd:
http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/~shehjart/docs/nfsmeasurements/ext4fallocate_read.png

2. Sequential write throughput with iozone over NFS mount with the 
nfsd writing the file contents to disk using pre-allocation.
http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/~shehjart/docs/nfsmeasurements/ext4fallocate_write.png

Please see the following thread for more details.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/21365

 From the write throughput plot, its clear that pre-allocation would be
highly beneficial if the pre-allocation overhead can be reduced.

Thanks
Shehjar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html