linux-ext4 - Re: Porting Zfs features to ext2/3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <488D402A.2030806@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:42:34 +1000
From:	Shehjar Tikoo <shehjart@....unsw.edu.au>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
CC:	postrishi <postrishi@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Porting Zfs features to ext2/3

Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:49:18AM +1000, Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
>> Hi Ted
>>
>> Theodore Tso wrote:
>>> The btrfs filesystem effort is an attempt to create a filesystem that 
>>> will leapfrog the ZFS feature set, but it will probably take longer to 
>>> reach production ready status than ext4.
>> Since you mention btrfs here and since I've read this earlier too, do
>> you know if btrfs will be the default Linux file system in the future,
>> like extX has been?
> 
 > ...
> What happens in the future, who can say?  At some point the ext2/3/4
> filesystem, which is based fundamentally on a BSD Fast Filesystem
> design base, may get displaced by a filesystem which uses some very
> different design as a starting point, when the advantages of starting
> with that different design outweighs the advantages of backwards
> compatibility and broad base of support which is enjoyed by ext2/3/4.

Thanks. That sums up the trade-off pretty clearly.


-Shehjar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html