[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200807291111.42941.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:11:42 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hifumi.hisashi@....ntt.co.jp,
jack@....cz, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 12/17] vfs: pagecache usage optimization for pagesize!=blocksize
On Tuesday 29 July 2008 09:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:00:32 -0400
>
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:46:36PM -0700, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> > > From: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@....ntt.co.jp>
> > >
> > > When we read some part of a file through pagecache, if there is a
> > > pagecache of corresponding index but this page is not uptodate, read IO
> > > is issued and this page will be uptodate.
> >
> > I was under the impression we wanted to do this in a nicer way than
> > the hacky method?
>
> The only description I've seen of "a nicer way" is vague two-word
> descriptions of "changing readpage". Or something. No indication of
> what those changes are, nor who will implement them nor when.
>
> That just isn't solid enough to block a change which has significant
> performance benefits.
Yes I thought it would be nicer to do it by changing readpage, but I
said I'm happy to try to consolidate them myself down the track. It
is fairly low impact on core code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists