[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <loom.20080729T222131-137@post.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:52:26 +0000 (UTC)
From: Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@...s-3g.org>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Porting Zfs features to ext2/3
Theodore Tso <tytso <at> mit.edu> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 04:54:41PM -0600, Eric Anopolsky wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 01:49 -0700, postrishi wrote:
> > >
> > > I want to know that has any work been done to port the Zfs features to
> > > ext2/3
> >
> > Did you know that ZFS is available for Linux?
>
> ZFS is available in a FUSE filesystem. As a userspace filesystem, it
> means a huge number of context switches to get data between the disk,
> to the kernel, to the FUSE userspace, back to the kernel, and to the
> process trying to access the ZFS file.
Transferring 4 kB from a commodity disk (disk seek + rotational delay +
transfer) takes usually between 100-4,000 usec. Two context switches
take about 2 usec, i.e. only 2-0.05% of the full data transfer time.
In other words, there isn't really time for huge number of context
switches because most of the time is spent waiting for the disk.
> That's not going to be high performance.
I did also an in memory test on a T9300@2.5, with disk I/O completely
eliminated. Results:
tmpfs: 975 MB/sec
ntfs-3g: 889 MB/sec (note, this FUSE driver is not optimized yet)
ext3: 675 MB/sec
> For someone who wants to migrate from Solaris to Linux,
> it might be useful, but I'm not sure you would really want to use a
> ZFS/FUSE implementation in production.
It seems the problem is that the only active ZFS-FUSE developer was
hired by SUN and since then not much (visible) is happening.
Regards, Szaka
--
NTFS-3G: http://ntfs-3g.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists