linux-ext4 - Re: Porting Zfs features to ext2/3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080730013427.GD29748@mit.edu>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:34:27 -0400
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To:	Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@...s-3g.org>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Porting Zfs features to ext2/3

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:52:26PM +0000, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
> I did also an in memory test on a T9300@2.5, with disk I/O completely 
> eliminated. Results:
> 
> tmpfs:    975 MB/sec
> ntfs-3g:  889 MB/sec  (note, this FUSE driver is not optimized yet)
> ext3:     675 MB/sec

Am I write in guessing that this test involved copying a single large
file, with no seeks?  What happens if you try benchmarking unpacking a
kernel source tar.bz2 file?  My guess is that ntfs-3g won't look as
good.  :-)

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html