linux-ext4 - Re: tracepoints in ext4 (and/or ext3?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080812110833.946B.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:13:55 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tracepoints in ext4 (and/or ext3?)

> As just an initial inquiry, I'm wondering how people would feel about
> putting some tracepoints (trace_mark()) into ext[34] for monitoring the
> fs behavior.
> 
> Good/bad/indifferent?

I think tracepoint on ext[34] is very good idea :)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html